Case Studies

Real situations. Real outcomes.

Every client situation is unique. These case studies illustrate how we approach common financial challenges faced by tech professionals, sales leaders, and real estate investors. All details are anonymized or composited to protect client privacy.

Case Study 01

From 75% concentration to a tax-efficient diversification plan — without a single dollar of unnecessary tax

RSU Planning Concentrated Stock Tax Strategy Alternative Investments Diversification
Client profile
Senior Software Engineer
Large Semiconductor Company
California · Married Filing Jointly

The situation

A senior software engineer came to us with $1.5M in a single employer's stock — 75% of her investable assets — and $500K in retirement accounts. She had been vesting RSUs for several years but had never sold. Her previous advisor's only strategy was selling covered calls, a poor approach for a highly volatile tech stock that offered no real protection against concentration risk or tax exposure.

The challenge

With combined household income of $730K (married filing jointly), California state taxes compounded an already significant federal burden. Any straight sale of the concentrated position would have triggered an immediate tax bill in the highest marginal brackets. The stock had continued to appreciate — making the concentration worse over time, not better. She knew the risk but had no viable path forward.

What we did

We built a rolling 5-year diversification plan using a layered approach: Oil & Gas investments to generate immediate deductions against earned income, followed by a structured sequence of tax-advantaged exchange strategies to systematically reduce concentration. The exchange funds became the foundation of a globally diversified portfolio — turning a concentrated single-stock risk into a professionally managed, multi-asset investment structure without triggering unnecessary tax events.

The strategy — year by year

2022

Oil & Gas investment ($100K) + Qualified Opportunity Zone fund ($300K) — the Oil & Gas investment generated ~$90K in deductions against ordinary income, meaningfully reducing the household tax burden. Simultaneously, $300K of concentrated stock was exchanged into a Qualified Opportunity Zone fund, deferring capital gains while repositioning into a diversified real estate vehicle with long-term tax advantages.

2023

Oil & Gas investment ($100K) — continued the deduction strategy, generating another ~$90K offset against earned income as RSUs continued to vest and the position grew.

2024

721 Exchange ($200K) + Oil & Gas investment ($100K) — $200K of concentrated shares were exchanged into a diversified REIT structure via a 721 exchange. This became the first building block of a globally diversified portfolio constructed around the exchange funds, converting a single-stock position into a professionally managed, income-producing real estate portfolio without triggering a taxable event. Oil & Gas deductions continued.

2025

351 Exchange ($200K) + Oil & Gas investment ($100K) — $200K in appreciated stock was contributed to a diversified investment fund via a 351 exchange, further expanding the globally diversified portfolio built around these exchange vehicles — adding another layer of asset class diversification while maintaining full tax deferral. Oil & Gas deductions continued.

Ongoing

As the stock has continued to soar well beyond original projections, what began as a 5-year plan has evolved into an ongoing wealth management engagement — one that will continue to incorporate new tax-efficient strategies as they become available and as the position and market conditions warrant.

Outcomes

$700K
Diversified in a tax-efficient manner over 3 years
~$270K
In Oil & Gas deductions generated across 3 years
75%→50%
Concentration reduced despite significant stock appreciation
2 referrals
Client and spouse referred their closest friends as new clients
"She came in knowing something was wrong. She left with a plan that addressed the tax burden, reduced the risk, and didn't force her to hand the IRS a check to do it. That's what good planning looks like."
— Nirav Desai, Founder, Qubera Wealth Management
Case Study 02

A $1M tax bill from a PE acquisition — reduced by nearly half through four coordinated strategies

Liquidity Event Tax Strategy QOZ Investment Short-Term Rental Charitable Planning CLAT
Client profile
Senior Director, Bay Area SaaS Company
(IPO 2019, PE Acquisition 2021)
California · Married, Non-Working Spouse

The situation

A Senior Director at a Bay Area SaaS company came to us after his company — which had gone public in 2019 — was acquired by private equity in 2021, forcing the liquidation of approximately $2.5M in stock. Combined with his $500K W2 income ($300K salary + $200K RSU), the event created a combined federal and California tax liability of over $1M. This was his first experience working with a financial advisor.

The challenge

The acquisition was involuntary — there was no opportunity to plan around the timing of the sale. With $714K in federal taxes and $330K in California state taxes due, the clock was ticking. The challenge was to deploy the proceeds intelligently in the time remaining in the tax year, using strategies that could legitimately reduce the tax burden without simply deferring the problem indefinitely.

What we did

We deployed four coordinated strategies simultaneously: a Qualified Opportunity Zone investment to defer capital gains, a short-term vacation rental to generate active business losses against ordinary income, a Charitable Lead Annuity Trust funded from the proceeds to generate an immediate charitable deduction, and ongoing investment management for the remaining assets. Together these reduced a $1.044M combined tax bill by nearly $485K.

Tax exposure — before and after planning

Without planning

Federal taxes$714,000
California state taxes$330,000
Total tax bill$1,044,000

After planning

Federal taxes paid$384,000
California taxes paid$175,000
Total tax paid$559,000
Total tax savings
~$485,000
Across federal and California — through four coordinated strategies deployed in a single tax year
Tax bill reduced by
46%
From $1.044M down to $559K

The four strategies

Strategy 1
Qualified Opportunity Zone Investment — $500K

$500K of the liquidation proceeds were invested in a Qualified Opportunity Zone fund in 2021, deferring the associated federal capital gains tax (23.8%) until April 2027. This removes a significant portion of the gain from the current year's tax calculation while repositioning the capital into a long-term investment with potential future tax advantages.

Strategy 2
Short-Term Vacation Rental — Lake Tahoe Area

Using $300K of proceeds as a 20% down payment, the client purchased a $1.5M vacation rental in the Lake Tahoe area, managed actively by his wife. Because short-term rentals qualify as a business — not a passive investment — active management of as few as 100–500 hours is sufficient to unlock business loss treatment. The resulting $400K in depreciation deductions generated dollar-for-dollar offsets against both federal and California ordinary income. The property has since appreciated to approximately $1.8M and generates ongoing cashflow — and family memories for the couple and their young sons.

Strategy 3
Charitable Lead Annuity Trust (CLAT) — $500K

$500K was contributed to a Charitable Lead Annuity Trust — an irrevocable trust that pays a fixed annuity to charity for a set term, with the remaining assets passing back to the client or his heirs at the end. The contribution generated an immediate $500K charitable deduction in 2021. Structured as a backloaded CLAT, the charitable payments begin modestly and increase over time, allowing the trust assets to compound in the early years. At the end of the 20-year term, the projected residual is a low-seven-figure asset base — potentially transferable to heirs gift-tax free if trust growth exceeds the IRS hurdle rate. For a client who is genuinely charitably minded, the CLAT delivers both an immediate tax benefit and a lasting legacy of giving.

Strategy 4
Ongoing Investment Management & 2027 Planning

The remaining proceeds were invested in a diversified, tax-efficient portfolio — coordinated across all four strategies to ensure the full financial picture remained integrated. When the deferred QOZ taxes come due in April 2027, the plan accounts for this in two ways: tax-free distributions from the QOZ investment will offset a portion of the liability, and for the remainder, a box-spread loan strategy will be used to generate low-cost, tax-deductible financing — avoiding the need to liquidate appreciated assets and trigger additional capital gains taxes in order to pay the bill.

Outcomes

~$485K
In tax savings across federal and California
$1.8M
Vacation rental appreciated from $1.5M, generating ongoing cashflow
20 years
Of charitable giving funded through the CLAT
Ongoing
Still a client — refers new clients on a regular basis
"The acquisition was involuntary — he didn't choose the timing. What he could choose was how to respond to it. Four strategies deployed in one tax year cut nearly half a million dollars from his bill and built assets that will benefit his family and the causes he cares about for decades."
— Nirav Desai, Founder, Qubera Wealth Management
Case Study 03

A 39-year rental, exchanged instead of sold: $156,265 of taxes deferred and net rental income raised from $8,606 to $19,304

1031 Exchange DST Investing Real Estate Tax Strategy Retirement Income Depreciation Recapture
Client profile
Retiree, Los Angeles
Married Filing Jointly
Exchange closed April 2026

The situation

A Los Angeles retiree had held the same rental house since 1987 — 39 years. He bought it for $113,000, of which $70,000 was land. The building had been fully depreciated years ago. The property was now worth $675,000 and he had an all-cash, as-is offer in hand. The rent brought in $21,600 a year gross, and after $12,994 of expenses he was left with $8,606 of net rental income. He was done being a landlord and was ready to sign.

The problem he didn't know he had

Because the building was fully depreciated, his adjusted basis had fallen to the $70,000 of land. Against an amount realized of $638,933, that produced a taxable gain of $568,933. Stacked on top of his pension and Social Security, an outright sale would have cost $89,967 in federal income tax, $15,349 in net investment income tax, and $50,949 in California tax — $156,265 in all. Of the $516,600 of cash the closing would have produced, he would have kept $360,335.

What we did

He called before signing, which is the only reason any of this was available. We engaged a Qualified Intermediary and structured the disposition as a 1031 exchange. $497,218 moved through the QI and was deployed into four professionally managed multifamily Delaware Statutory Trusts across four separate markets — $495,000 of equity, plus $33,845 of rebated and credited commission, put $528,845 of capital to work and controlled $909,000 of real estate.

📞

He called before signing, and that is the only reason this worked

A 1031 exchange requires a Qualified Intermediary to be in place before the sale closes. Had he signed and taken receipt of the proceeds, the deferral would have been permanently unavailable and the full $156,265 would have come due with the 2026 return. There is no retroactive fix for this. One phone call, made in the right week, was the whole difference.

Tax exposure: outright sale vs. 1031 exchange

If he had signed and sold outright

Sale price$675,000
Less: commissions & closing costs($36,067)
Less: mortgage payoff($122,333)
Cash at closing, before taxes$516,600
Adjusted basis$70,000
Taxable gain$568,933
Federal income tax$89,967
Net investment income tax$15,349
California state tax$50,949
Total taxes$156,265
Net after taxes$360,335

The exchange as executed

Proceeds to the Qualified Intermediary$497,218
Cash boot received$20,000
Exchange expenses offsetting the boot$36,067
Gain recognized on Form 8824$0
Federal taxes payable$0
California taxes payable$0
FTB withholding, refundable on the 2026 return$667
Taxes deferred$156,265
The $20,000 of cash he took out would normally be taxable. Here the $36,067 of exchange expenses exceeded it, so Form 8824 line 15 floors at zero and no gain was recognized. This is deferral, not forgiveness. The $156,265 stays embedded in the replacement property and becomes payable if the DSTs are sold without a further exchange.

How the capital was deployed

From $495,000 of equity to $909,000 of real estate

Equity invested in the DSTs$495,000
Commission rebated & credited$33,845
Total capital at work$528,845
DST financing added$380,155
Total real estate value$909,000

Leverage, before and after

Original property loan-to-value18%
Replacement properties loan-to-value42%
Read this as a real increase in risk. The financing inside the DSTs is what satisfied the debt replacement requirement and what lifted his depreciable basis, but it also amplifies losses if property values fall, and it sits ahead of his equity in any downturn. The income figures below reflect that higher-risk capital structure.

Four DST properties, geographically diversified multifamily

🏙️
Kansas City
Missouri
🌳
Atlanta
Georgia
🌊
Long Island
New York
☀️
Kissimmee
Florida

Rental income, before and after

The old rental

Annual rental income$21,600
Less: annual expenses($12,994)
Net income$8,606
Remaining depreciation shelterExhausted
ManagementHis own
The building had been fully depreciated, so there was no shelter left. His pension put every dollar of that net income in a high marginal bracket.

The DST portfolio, four markets, no management

Projected annual distributions$23,270
Less: advisory fee($3,966)
Net cashflow after fee$19,304
Depreciation shelterReset and restarted
ManagementNone
More than double the net income, none of the landlord work, and spread across four markets instead of concentrated in one house. Distributions are projected, not guaranteed.

Why that income is tax-advantaged

The larger number is only half the story. The old rental threw off $8,606 that was fully taxable, because 39 years of depreciation had used up every dollar of shelter. The exchange fixed that, and the reason is worth understanding.

Replacement property value
$909,000
Less: gain deferred into it
($568,933)
New depreciable basis
$340,067

He walked in with $70,000 of basis and walked out with $340,067 — a depreciation schedule almost five times larger than the one he had exhausted. Distributions arrive as cash, but taxable income is what the properties report after depreciation and interest and it passes through on a K-1. Because a fresh depreciation schedule now runs against a position that had none left, part of each year's distribution is offset by depreciation rather than taxed as it arrives. The share varies year to year with the sponsors' reporting.

Outcomes

$156,265
In federal and California taxes deferred rather than paid in 2026
$909,000
Of replacement real estate from $495,000 of equity
$19,304
Net annual cashflow after fees, up from $8,606, with no management
4.9×
Increase in depreciable basis, from $70,000 to $340,067
"He had the offer in hand and no idea that his basis was down to the dirt. Thirty-nine years of depreciation had to be reckoned with, and signing first would have made that permanent. The exchange did two things at once: it kept $156,265 with him instead of with the state and the IRS, and it restarted a depreciation schedule that had been exhausted for years."
— Nirav Desai, Founder, Qubera Wealth Management

Important disclosures for this case

Deferral is not elimination. A 1031 exchange defers taxes. The $156,265 stays embedded in the replacement property and becomes payable on a later sale that is not itself exchanged. Figures come from the client's settlement statement, tax return, and client-provided records, and represent a planning computation rather than a filed return.

Leverage increased materially. Loan-to-value rose from 18% on the original property to 42% across the replacement properties. The income comparison is not like-for-like: it reflects a higher-risk capital structure, and the two figures are built differently. $8,606 was net rental income after operating expenses; $19,304 is projected cash distributed after the advisory fee, before the client's own tax on the taxable portion.

DSTs carry substantial risk. They are illiquid with no secondary market, principal may be lost, distributions are projected rather than guaranteed and can be reduced or suspended, and the investor has no control over property-level decisions. DST offerings typically carry front-end costs of roughly 8–12%, so the capital actually at work is less than the amount invested. A portion of any distribution may represent return of capital rather than income.

This outcome is specific to this client. It is one engagement, chosen because it illustrates the timing point clearly, and it is not representative of results for other clients. Different basis, holding period, income, state of residence, or replacement property would produce materially different results. Nothing here guarantees comparable outcomes.

Qubera Wealth Management, Inc. is compensated through asset-based advisory fees. An exchange into a managed DST portfolio results in assets under our management and therefore ongoing fees, while selling the property and paying the taxes, or keeping it, generally does not. That is a conflict of interest and you should weigh our recommendation accordingly. See Item 5 of our Form ADV Part 2A. This material is for information only and is not tax or legal advice. Consult your own CPA and attorney before acting.

Does your situation look like one of these?

Schedule a free 30-minute call. We'll tell you honestly whether we think we can help — and what that might look like.

Schedule a Free Call